P r a c t i c e U p d a t e September 2022

5 September 2022

WHAT’S NEW IN THE 2020-21 AND 2021-22 INCOME YEARS


  • The temporary shortcut method, introduced to help employees working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic, was extended to 30 June 2022. It is therefore available to use to work out deductions for working from home expenses for the 2020-21- and 2021-22-income years.
  • Taxation Ruling TR 2021/1 Income tax: when are deductions allowed for employees’ transport expenses? was released. This Ruling provides guidance on when an employee can and can’t claim a deduction for the cost of travel by airline, train, taxi, car, bus, boat or other vehicles.
  • Taxation Ruling TR 2021/4 Income tax and fringe benefits tax: employee accommodation, food and drink expenses, travel allowances, and living-away-from-home allowances were released. This Ruling provides guidance on when an employee is entitled to claim a deduction for accommodation, food and drink expenses.
  • Section 25-125 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) was introduced. This section allows employees to claim a deduction for the cost of COVID-19 tests incurred after 1 July 2021 for the purpose of testing to determine whether they can attend or remain at their workplace.

COMMON MYTHS ABOUT WORK EXPENSE DEDUCTIONS

Many taxpayers hold many misconceptions – some results of pub talk or discussions from backyard barbeques…

Myth: Everyone can automatically claim $150 for clothing and laundry expenses, 5000 km under the cents per kilometre method for car expenses, or $300 for work-related expenses, even if they did not spend the money.

Fact: There is no such thing as an automatic or standard deduction. Substantiation exceptions provide relief from the need to keep receipts in certain circumstances. While you do not need receipts for claims under $300 for work-related expenses, $150 for laundry expenses (note: this is for laundry expenses only and doesn’t include clothing expenses) or if you are claiming 5,000 km or less for car expenses under the cents per kilometre method:

  • you must have spent the money
  • it must be related to earning your income, and
  • you must be able to explain how you calculated your claim.

Myth: I do not need a receipt; I can just use my bank or credit card statement.

Fact: To claim a tax deduction, you need to show that you spent the money, what you spent it on, who the supplier was and when you paid. Bank or credit card statements alone don’t have this information. You don’t need these details only if substantiation exceptions apply.

 

Myth: I can claim makeup that contains sunscreen if I work outside.

Fact: Cosmetics are usually a private expense, and adding sun protection doesn’t make it deductible. However, it may be deductible if the product’s primary purpose is sunscreen (that is, it has a high SPF rating), the cosmetic component is incidental, and you need to work outdoors in the sun.

 

Myth: I can claim my gym membership because I need to be fit for work.

Fact: Very few people can claim gym membership fees. To be eligible, your job would have to depend on you maintaining a very high level of fitness, for which you are regularly tested, for example, special operations personnel in the Australian Defence Force.

 

Myth: I can claim all my travel expenses if I add a conference or a few days’ works to my holiday.

Fact: If you decide to add a conference or work to your holiday or a holiday to your work trip, you must apportion the travel expenses between the private and work-related components and only claim the work-related component.

 

Myth: I can claim my work clothes because my boss told me to wear a certain colour.

Fact: Unless your clothing is a unique and distinct uniform to your employer or protective or occupation-specific clothing you are required to wear to earn your income, you won’t be able to claim it. Plain clothes, like black pants, aren’t deductible even if your employer tells you to wear them.

 

Myth: I can claim my pay television subscription because I need to keep up to date for work.

Fact: A subscription to pay television is not ordinarily deductible. Keeping up to date on the news, current affairs and other general matters usually won’t have a sufficiently close connection with your employment activities to provide a basis for deducting these subscriptions. They are essentially private expenses.

 

Myth: I can claim home-to-work travel because I need to get to work to earn my income.

Fact: For most of us, home-to-work travel is a private expense.

 

Myth: I’ve got a capped phone and internet plan to claim both business and private phone calls and internet usage.

Fact: Unless you only use your phone and internet for work, you have to apportion the cost between work-related and private usage and only claim the work-related portion of your expenses.


SHARING ECONOMY REPORTING BILL INTRODUCED

Electronic distribution platforms

This legislation requires operators of electronic distribution platforms to report information to the ATO relating to transactions facilitated through their platform.

The Treasury Laws Amendment (2022 Measures No.2) was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3.8.2022 and proposed to:

  • empower the Commissioner to direct an entity to complete an approved record-keeping course where the Commissioner reasonably believes the entity has failed to comply with its tax-related record-keeping obligations as an alternative to existing financial penalties
  • require electronic platform operations to provide information on transactions made through the platform to the ATO
  • removes the $250 non-deductible threshold for work-related self-education expenses;
  • enable small business entities to apply to the small business Taxation Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) for an order staying or otherwise affecting the operation or implementation of decisions of the Commissioner that are being reviewed by the AATO; and
  • allow individuals aged 55 and above to make downsizer contributions to their superannuation plan from the proceeds of selling their main residence.

If all this sounds familiar… similar legislation was introduced during the last parliament but lapsed in the Senate before the May Federal Election.


SHINING A LIGHT ON ‘OFF-THE-BOOKS’ PAYMENTS

Building & construction, cleaning, courier, road freight, IT, security, surveillance industries

Dodgy contractors trying to keep income ‘off-the-books’ and businesses helping them do so are being put on notice as the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) continues to shine a light on shadow economy behaviour.

Paying cash in hand to avoid paying taxes is a significant part of the shadow economy. However, the taxable payment reporting system (TPRS) allows the ATO to investigate this conduct.

Around $350 billion in payments made to 950,000 contractors were reported to the ATO in the last financial year. The ATO expects more than 270,000 businesses to complete a taxable payment annual report (TPAR) for 2021-22 years.

TPRS obligations apply to businesses in the building and construction industry, as well as businesses that provide cleaning, courier, road freight, information technology and security, investigation, or surveillance services and have paid sub-contractors in relation to these services.

The ATO is reminding these businesses that they will have to lodge a TPAR with the ATO by 28 August, setting out payments to their contractors.

Sole-traders

The ATO uses information reported on the TPAR to make sure that businesses are complying with their tax obligations, for example, reporting the correct amount of income, lodging business activity statements (BAS) and income tax returns, paying the right amount of tax, being registered for GST if required, and using a valid Australian business number (ABN).

Businesses and tax professionals can view the data the ATO receives about their business, like taxable payments reported under the TPRS, as a reported transaction on ATO Online platforms.

The ATO’s new reported transactions services can help businesses and their tax professionals to view their data to make it easier to meet tax obligations.

ATO reminds sole traders any payments reported to the ATO through TPRS will be pre-filled in their tax return at tax time.

If you’re a sole trader, any payments you received as a contractor reported in a TPAR will be available as a pre-fill information report in your tax return. Whether you lodge your tax return yourself or through an agent, just remember to double-check that the pre-fill information is complete and correct before lodging, especially as not all your income may have been reported to the ATO.

The ATO reminds businesses and tax professionals lodging on behalf of their clients to contact the ATO if they need additional time to lodge their TPAR.


UNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS LEGISLATION

The Government intends to make unfair contract terms illegal, protecting small businesses and the hard-working Australians they employ.

Small businesses and consumers often lack the resources and bargaining power to effectively review and negotiate terms in standard contracts. Existing laws haven’t stopped the use of unfair terms, which remain prevalent in standard form contracts.

The Government has introduced legislation to strengthen unfair contract terms protections for small businesses and consumers.

The amendments will introduce civil penalty provisions outlawing the use of, and reliance on, unfair terms in standard form contracts. This will enable a regulator to seek a civil penalty from a court.

Additionally, a larger number of small business contracts will be afforded protection. This will occur by increasing the small business eligibility threshold for the protections from less than 20 employees to less than 100 employees and introducing an annual turnover threshold of less than $10 million as an alternative threshold for determining eligibility.

These reforms will help to improve consumer and small business confidence, allowing the small business sector to grow with confidence.


SMALL BUSINESSES URGED TO SAFEGUARD DOMAIN NAMES

The Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise have implored small businesses to take urgent action to safeguard their brand and identity on the internet or risk seeing impersonators, web-name campers or cyber criminals take up domain names just like theirs. With all the challenges small business owners and leaders are facing, the last thing anyone needs is someone ripping off their domain name.

With only a handful of weeks left before owners of .com.au, .net.au and similar domain names lose their priority access to the abridged .au domain name equivalents, there are significant concerns about plans to allow an open slather sale of business internet names under the new .au domain.

All business owners must take a few minutes to work out if they want the shortened .au domain or will be unhappy for someone else to have it. If the .au domain name is important, small business owners are urged to take a few minutes and few dollars to register it or potentially face someone else grabbing it and using it to digitally ambush your business, to demand big dollars later to surrender it to you or misuse it to masquerade as you or to help them engage in cyber-crime.

The Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise mentioned the change imposed by the non-government regulator, .au Domain Administration (auDA), had potentially momentous consequences that could see businesses lose their customer base or be at the mercy of cyber criminals impersonating them if they did not proactively sign up to the new system.

The auDA introduced the new system on 24 March, allowing anyone with a connection to Australia, such as businesses, associations, and individuals, to register a new domain name category. Instead of ending with .com.au, .net.au, asn.au, etc., people could register the shorter .au name. For example, shoes.com.au could be shoes.au

It also decided that Australian businesses with an existing domain name would only have until 20 September to reserve or register their equivalent .au domain name before it became available to the general public.

2 September 2025
Land tax in Australia: exemptions, tips and lessons Land tax is one of those quiet state-based taxes that does not grab headlines like income tax or GST, but impacts property owners once thresholds are crossed. It applies when the unimproved value of land exceeds a certain amount, which differs from state to state. Principal places of residence are usually exempt, but investment properties, commercial holdings, and certain rural blocks may be subject to taxation. For individuals and small businesses, land tax is worth paying attention to because exemptions can make the difference between a manageable annual bill and a nasty surprise. A recent case in New South Wales (Zonadi case ) has sharpened the focus on when land used for cultivation qualifies for the primary production exemption. The lessons are timely for farmers, winegrowers and anyone with mixed-use rural land. The basics of land tax Each state and territory (except the Northern Territory) imposes land tax. Key features include: Assessment date : Usually determined at midnight on 31 December of the preceding year (for example, the 2026 assessment is based on ownership and use as at 31 December 2025). Thresholds : Vary across jurisdictions. For example, in 2025, the NSW threshold is $1,075,000, while in Victoria it is $300,000. Exemptions : Principal place of residence, primary production land, land owned by charities and specific concessional categories. Rates : Progressive, with higher landholdings paying higher rates. Unlike council rates, which fund local services, land tax is a revenue measure for states. It is payable annually and calculated on the total taxable value of landholdings. Primary production exemption Most states exempt land used for primary production from land tax. The policy aim is precise: farmers should not be burdened with land tax when using their land to produce food, fibre or similar goods. However, the details of what constitutes primary production vary. Qualifying uses generally include: cultivation (growing crops or horticulture) maintaining animals (grazing, dairying, poultry, etc.) commercial fishing and aquaculture beekeeping Sounds straightforward, but the catch is in how the land is used and for what purpose. Lessons from the Zonadi case The Zonadi case involved an 11-hectare vineyard in the Hunter Valley. The land was used for: 4.2ha of vines producing wine grapes a cellar door and wine storage area a residence and tourist accommodation some trees, paddocks and access ways During five land tax years in dispute, the taxpayer sold some grapes directly but used most of the crop to make wine off-site, which was then sold through the cellar door. Income was derived from grape sales, wine sales and tourist accommodation. The NSW Tribunal had to decide whether the land’s dominant use was cultivation for the purpose of selling the produce of that cultivation (a requirement under section 10AA of the NSW Land Tax Management Act). The outcome was a blow for the taxpayer. The Tribunal said: Growing grapes was indeed a form of cultivation and amounted to primary production. But cultivation for the purpose of making wine did not qualify, because the exemption only applies where the produce is sold in its natural state. Wine is a converted product, not the product of cultivation. Although some grapes were sold directly, the bulk of the financial gain came from wine sales. Therefore, the dominant use of the land was cultivation to make and sell wine, which is not exempt. The exemption was denied, and the taxpayer was left with a land tax bill. Why this matters For small businesses, especially those that combine farming with value-adding activities such as processing or tourism, the case serves as a warning. The line between primary production and secondary production can determine whether a land tax exemption applies. If most income comes from a cellar door, farmstay, or product manufacturing, the exemption may be at risk, even though cultivation is occurring on the land. Different rules in Victoria Victoria takes a broader view. It defines primary production to include cultivation for the purpose of selling the produce in a natural, processed or converted state. In other words, grapes sold for wine production would still be considered primary production. The only further hurdle is the “use test”, which depends on location: outside Greater Melbourne: land must be used primarily for primary production within urban zones: land must be used solely or mainly for the business of primary production Had Zonadi been in Victoria, the outcome could have been very different. The vineyard would likely have been exempt from this requirement. State-based comparisons Here’s a snapshot of how land tax treatment differs across states when it comes to cultivation and primary production:
10 July 2025
Shila is taking the leap
10 July 2025
Key concerns when selling a business in: A strategic guide for business owners